Because most marketing materials are built to describe the company, while salespeople need help with the specific moment a deal is stuck. Reps ignore decks, one-pagers and case study templates when they do not answer the questions buyers actually ask, when they cannot find them in under a minute, or when nobody from sales helped make them. The fix is to build fewer assets, each one tied to a real objection or stage in the deal, with sales in the room from the start.
A familiar pattern: marketing spends a quarter on a new sales deck, a set of one-pagers and a brochure. Sales says thanks. Six weeks later the reps are still sending the old deck, or a version they edited themselves, or nothing at all. Marketing feels ignored and sales feels it was handed homework. Both are right.
In 15 years leading marketing and operations, I have seen the same few causes behind this almost every time.
Marketing tends to write about features, history and the company story. Buyers in the middle of a deal ask narrower questions: how long does it take to see results, what happens if it does not work, how is this different from the option we already have, what will my boss ask me. If the asset does not answer the question in front of the rep, the rep writes their own email instead.
Most collateral is made for the first meeting. Many deals are lost later, at the proposal, the internal approval or the comparison with a competitor. Reps rarely struggle to open a conversation. They struggle to help their champion sell it inside the buyer's company.
Assets live in a shared drive with five versions of each file. A rep on a call will not spend three minutes searching. If it is not one click away from where they work, it does not exist.
When reps did not help shape an asset, they do not trust it to sound like them, and they worry it will make a promise they cannot keep.
Spend one week on this before making anything new.
| Ask or check | If the answer is | The cause is |
|---|---|---|
| Ask three reps which asset they sent last and why | Something they wrote themselves | Wrong questions or wrong tone |
| List the last ten lost deals and the stage they died at | Most died after the first meeting | Assets built for the wrong stage |
| Time how long it takes a rep to find the current case study | More than a minute | Access, not content |
| Ask who from sales reviewed the last deck | Nobody | No sales input, so no trust |
| Listen to three recorded sales calls | The same objections come up repeatedly | Your real asset list, written by buyers |
The assets reps actually use tend to be short and specific. A one-page answer to the most common objection. A comparison against the option buyers usually consider instead, written fairly. A short summary a champion can forward to their boss without editing. A simple rollout plan that shows what the first 30 days look like for the buyer. A pricing explanation that makes the number make sense before the proposal arrives.
That is often five assets, not fifty. Each one exists because a deal stalled without it. My sales enablement assets page lays out how I organize them by deal stage. If the larger problem is that leads arrive but rarely close, read why leads do not turn into customers, and for the handoff between teams, how to align sales and marketing on lead handoff.
Run the checks in the table above. Write down the five objections or questions that come up most often, in the buyer's words, and the stage where deals most often stall.
Archive every old version. Put the few assets worth keeping in one place reps can reach in one click, ideally inside the CRM or the tool they live in. Name files by the question they answer, not by the date.
Pick the two biggest stalls. Draft each asset with one rep in a working session, using their language. Keep each to a page. Have the rep send it in live deals that week.
Ask which deals the new assets went into and what happened. Keep what gets used, fix what does not, and only then build the next two. Agree on a monthly 30-minute session where sales brings the new questions buyers are asking.
The first month above is mostly time: a few hours from marketing and one or two hours a week from a rep. It usually costs far less than another round of polished collateral nobody sends. If you need someone senior to run sales and marketing as one revenue system, a full-time CMO typically costs $280,000 to $450,000 a year. My fractional CMO engagements run $2,500 to $50,000 a month, most between $8,000 and $15,000, month to month with no long contract. The full breakdown is on my fractional CMO cost page.
Get help when sales and marketing blame each other for missed numbers, when nobody owns the space between a lead and a closed deal, or when you have rebuilt the deck twice and reps still do not use it. A fractional CMO sits across both teams, finds where deals stall and makes sure marketing builds what sales needs to close. I run every account myself and target first results within 30 days.
Sales enablement content is the material salespeople use inside live deals to move a buyer forward: objection answers, competitor comparisons, short case summaries, pricing explanations, proposal templates and documents a champion can share internally. It differs from general marketing content, which is built to attract attention. Enablement content is built for a specific moment in a specific conversation, so it is narrower, shorter and more direct.
Marketing should own producing and maintaining them, and sales should own deciding what is needed. In practice that means sales brings the questions and objections buyers raise, marketing turns them into clear assets, and both review use every month. When either side owns it alone, you get either polished materials nobody sends or rough documents every rep rewrites.
Fewer than most expect. Five to eight well-made assets usually cover the questions that stall most deals: the main objection, a fair comparison with the usual alternative, a summary for the buyer's boss, a rollout plan and a pricing explanation. Add more only when a recurring question shows up in sales calls that nothing in the current set answers.
Track two things. First, use: which assets reps send and in which deals, which your CRM or document tool can usually show. Second, effect: whether deals where an asset was sent move to the next stage more often or faster than those where it was not. If an asset is never sent, ask reps why before rewriting it. The reason is usually access or relevance.
MarkCMO provides the strategy and the roadmap, and then delivers it across three tiers, so you get direction and execution from one team instead of handing a deck to someone else to build.
Fractional CMO and COO leadership: strategy, positioning, go-to-market, and the roadmap that sets the direction.
Running the function day to day: managing teams, vendors, budgets, and the operating cadence that keeps the plan on track.
Hands-on delivery: marketing execution, software development, tech-stack build and integration, plus finance and operations support, everything a business needs to scale.
From tech to marketing to finance, strategy through execution, MarkCMO can lead it, manage it, and build it.
Book a free 30-minute call; you leave with the one thing costing you the most pipeline.
Book a free 30-minute call